Food in an unfamiliar supermarket: what to look for on the label
In an unfamiliar supermarket, a package can look entirely unreadable, but usually only the words are.
What a package tells you in ten seconds, and where it misleads.
In an unfamiliar supermarket, a package can look entirely unreadable, but usually only the words are.
Pork is rarely called pork in an ingredients list.
An ingredients list in a foreign language in a Russian shop means either a violation, a detached sticker, or a purchase made outside Russia.
Of all the labels on packaging, "organic" is a rare case where the word is backed by a legal document.
In a physical store, you can turn the packaging over in your hands.
Sulfites are the only item on the list of mandatory allergens that are not always declared, but only starting from a certain amount.
Olivier salad does not have one correct number: one cook's version may have twice as many calories as another's, despite using the same ingredients.
The label "for diabetic nutrition" describes one property of a product — it contains fewer simple sugars than its standard counterpart.
One kilocalorie equals 4.
Xanthan gum, guar gum, carrageenan, pectin, modified starch — this is a set of words that looks alarming on an ingredient label but means something quite boring: the product needs to have the right consistency and not separate before its expiration date.
Potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate account for the majority of industrial preservation: the former works against mold and yeast, while the latter works in acidic environments against a wide range of microorganisms.
Acidity regulators are the most numerous and the most boring group of additives.
Sodium nitrite is an additive with the worst reputation and one of the most clear-cut functions.
The color of food carries information: it is used to judge ripeness, freshness, and taste even before the first bite.
Sudan I, II, III, and IV are synthetic dyes for industrial use: they are used to color waxes, oils, solvents, and polishes.
The word "preservative" on an ingredient label is often seen as a negative, and products "without preservatives" sell better.
A short ingredient list sells better than a long one, and manufacturers know it.
The same brand in two countries may have a different composition, and this is not always about cost-cutting.
Water and fat do not mix—this is a basic fact, and it is the source of half the problems in food technology.
A store-brand product costs 20–40% less than a name-brand equivalent sitting right next to it on the shelf.
The three-digit number after the letter E is not random: it carries information about why the substance was added.
The label "may contain traces of nuts" is found on half the shelves, including products where nuts have no business being.
A liter of milk has turned into 900 milliliters, a dozen eggs into nine, and a chocolate bar has shrunk from 100 grams to 85.
A person with a birch pollen allergy bites into an apple and feels itching and tingling in their mouth.
Cocoa butter is the most expensive part of chocolate, and an entire category of products that look indistinguishable from it has been built around its replacement.
The argument that "this additive is banned in Europe" sounds convincing and almost always requires clarification.
Manufacturers are required to disclose certain allergens at all times—even when their proportion is negligible and even when they entered the product as part of another ingredient.
Condensed milk is a product made of two ingredients: milk and sugar.
There is a separate, significantly narrower list of permitted additives for baby food.
Butter and spread sit side by side, look the same, and cost different amounts.
Eggs are one of the most common food allergies in children, and for most, it resolves with age.
Sausage is the most convenient product for analyzing how recipes change: the changes are documented by percentages right on the packaging.
There is a confirmed trend: consumers prefer products with short and understandable ingredient lists.
In the list of mandatory allergens, fish, crustaceans, and mollusks are listed as three separate items, and this is not just bureaucracy: their proteins are different, and a reaction to shrimp does not mean a reaction to cod.
GOST is often read as a mark of quality, while TU is seen as permission to do whatever one wants.
In the list of mandatory allergens, peanuts and tree nuts are listed as two separate items, and this is not just a formality: peanuts are legumes, not nuts, and an allergy to them does not mean an allergy to hazelnuts or almonds.
The most common mistake with this allergy is looking for the word "milk" in the ingredients list.
Reading an entire ingredient list at the shelf is impossible: the print is small, and there is no time.
The common division into natural, nature-identical, and artificial flavorings has become ingrained in food discussions, even though it is no longer used in its original form in current regulations.
There are two numbers on a price tag.
There are two different ways for food to spoil.
The same cottage cheese gets different calorie counts in two apps, and people usually assume one of them is wrong.
Next to the familiar stripes on packaging, there is increasingly a small square made of dots.
There is a persistent belief about barcodes: that you can supposedly tell the country where a product was made from the first digits, and verify its authenticity from the rest.
The same buckwheat in three different apps gives three different calorie counts, and the package shows a fourth.
The word "sugar" appears in ingredients less often than sugar itself does in a product: it has a dozen legal names, and the manufacturer has every right to use any of them.
The front of a package speaks in short words: "light," "fitness," "sugar-free," "eco.
An ingredient list contains E330, and it is impossible to tell from this code whether it is citric acid or something better to avoid.
A label looks like a list of words from which everyone reads something different: one person considers a long list of ingredients a red flag, another looks for E numbers.
Two things on packaging cause the most fear: codes with the letter E and the acronym "GMO.
From reading to doing. All of it starts in one place — knowing what is on the plate. Photograph it and the calories and macros appear on their own.
Other topics: Protein · Fats · Carbohydrates · Sugar · Sweeteners · Fibre · Water and salt · Coffee and tea · Drinks and alcohol · Supplements and vitamins · Sports nutrition · Training · Sleep and routine · Appetite and stress · Fasting · Gut and microbiome · Diabetes and blood sugar · Hormones · Age · Children · Eating out · Travelling · Gatherings · Portion size · Storage and shelf life · Meat and sausage · Dairy · Bread and grains · Sweets and snacks · Plant-based · Food diary · What the research shows · All articles
This article is for general information. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a prescription for treatment or a diet, and it does not replace a consultation with your doctor. If you have a health condition, are pregnant, take medication, or follow a diet prescribed to you, decisions about food belong with your doctor.
Figures from regulations, guidelines and studies are given as they stood when this article was prepared and may since have changed; check them against the primary sources. This article is not advertising, an offer, or individual advice, and neither the author nor the site owner is responsible for decisions taken on the basis of it.