Open the app

How to determine portion size without a scale

A faceted glass with dry buckwheat, two white plates with different volumes of porridge, and a teaspoon with a mound of butter

Portion weight is the most inaccurate variable in any calculation, including analysis by photo. The good news is that for practical purposes, a rough estimate is sufficient.

Why weight matters more than it seems

The error in calorie content per 100 grams is usually small: most dishes have a recognizable range. An error in portion weight multiplies everything else. Confusing 200 and 350 grams of pilaf is a difference of almost 300 kcal, which is more than any inaccuracy in determining the recipe provides.

Therefore, if you are going to estimate only one thing, you should estimate the weight.

The palm method

Your own hand is a measure that is always with you and scales to the size of the person:

MeasureApproximately corresponds to
Palm without fingersPortion of meat or fish, 100–120 g
FistPortion of side dish or vegetables, 150–200 g
HandfulGrains or pasta in cooked form, about 100 g
ThumbPortion of butter, cheese, or nuts, 10–15 g
Tip of the thumbTeaspoon of oil, about 5 g

Common tableware as a measure

Once you have weighed your tableware, you get permanent reference points:

What is estimated worst of all

How accurate is photo-based estimation

Recognition works well to identify the dish itself and its typical calorie content per 100 grams. Portion weight is a weak point: it is derived from the angle, the size of the tableware, and the volume in the frame, and this is where the error is greatest.

Therefore, the weight is shown as a separate figure that can be corrected: if you know there are 200 g in the plate instead of 300, correct it, and the nutritional breakdown will be recalculated immediately and for free. Shooting from above and in full, with a piece of cutlery or a plate in the frame for scale, significantly improves the estimate.

Are scales needed at all

For daily control — no, the listed reference points are sufficient. But a week with a scale at the beginning pays off: it calibrates your eye, and further estimation "by eye" becomes noticeably more accurate. It makes sense to weigh, first and foremost, things that are most prone to error — oil, dry grains, and nuts.

Count it from a photo

Frequently asked questions

How to measure a portion without a scale?
Using the palm method: palm without fingers — 100–120 g of meat or fish, fist — 150–200 g of side dish, thumb — 10–15 g of butter or cheese. Once weighed, common tableware provides permanent reference points.
How many grams are in a tablespoon?
For dry products — 15–20 g, for liquids — about 15 ml. Teaspoon: approximately 5 g of sugar or 5 ml of oil.
Should I count calories for dry grains or cooked?
For cooked, if you are weighing what has already been boiled. During cooking, grains and pasta absorb water and increase in weight by 2.5–3 times: 100 g of dry buckwheat is about 300 kcal and approximately 300 g of porridge. Confusion here leads to a threefold error.
How accurately does the app determine portion weight?
Weight is the least accurate of the returned values because it depends on the angle and the tableware. Therefore, it is displayed as a separate figure that can be corrected: the nutritional breakdown is recalculated immediately and does not consume a request.

Read next

This article is for general information. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a prescription for treatment or a diet, and it does not replace a consultation with your doctor. If you have a health condition, are pregnant, take medication, or follow a diet prescribed to you, decisions about food belong with your doctor.

Figures from regulations, guidelines and studies are given as they stood when this article was prepared and may since have changed; check them against the primary sources. This article is not advertising, an offer, or individual advice, and neither the author nor the site owner is responsible for decisions taken on the basis of it.