Open the app

Japanese interval walking: what the 3-by-3 studies found

Two adults walk on a park path, one at a brisk pace and the other at an easy pace

Japanese interval walking alternates three minutes of fast walking with three minutes at an easy pace. In the original trial, it improved aerobic capacity and leg strength more than continuous moderate walking, but it was not tested directly against a 10,000-step target.

What the 3-by-3 method means

In the original randomized trial from Shinshu University, participants alternated three minutes of slow walking at about 40% of their peak aerobic capacity for walking with three minutes above 70%. They were asked to complete at least five cycles a day—30 minutes in total—on four or more days each week.

The “3-by-3” label can sound like three rounds of three minutes. That was not the research protocol: it was three minutes fast plus three minutes slow, repeated at least five times. The pace was individualized. A speed that feels easy to a trained walker may be demanding for a beginner.

Who was studied and for how long

Study featureWhat the trial did
Participants246 adults: 60 men and 186 women, with a mean age of 63 ± 6 years
DurationFive months, from May to October 2004
GroupsNo walking training; continuous walking at about 50% of peak capacity plus at least 8,000 steps a day; 3 + 3 minute interval walking
FrequencyFour or more days a week for both walking groups
OutcomesIsometric knee extension and flexion strength, peak aerobic capacity in walking and cycling tests, and resting blood pressure

Assignment was random, but not everyone met the training target. It was achieved by 42 of 87 people assigned to interval walking and 51 of 75 assigned to continuous walking. The results therefore should not be treated as a guaranteed effect from trying the timer a few times.

What changed after five months

In the interval group, knee extension strength increased by 13% and flexion strength by 17%. Peak aerobic capacity rose by 9% in the walking test and 8% in the cycling test. These changes were greater than those recorded in the continuous moderate-walking group. Resting systolic blood pressure fell by 9 mm Hg and diastolic pressure by 5 mm Hg; the difference in systolic reduction between the interval and moderate groups was statistically significant.

Those are results from one defined sample and one five-month program, not a promise that every walker will see the same change in fitness or blood pressure. The trial did not test weight loss, longevity, or disease prevention.

A later randomized trial of 68 adults with a mean age of 70 compared interval and normal walking for 20 weeks. Both groups improved on timed task tests and reduced carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Interval walking has not proved superior to ordinary walking for every outcome that researchers have examined.

Is it better than 10,000 steps?

There is no direct answer. The original comparison prescribed at least 8,000—not 10,000—steps a day on four or more days a week, at about 50% of each person's peak walking capacity. Against that program, intervals produced larger gains in the measured strength and aerobic-capacity outcomes.

Step counts and intervals answer different questions. Steps describe total movement across the day; the 3-by-3 protocol sets the intensity of one workout. A person can accumulate many easy steps without the same fitness stimulus, or finish an interval session and remain seated for the rest of the day. For the volume question, see how many steps to walk per day.

How to judge the fast pace without a lab test

The researchers prescribed intensity from an individual exercise test and monitored it with an accelerometer. A phone timer cannot reproduce that setup. The CDC talk test offers a rough guide: during moderate activity a person can talk but not sing; during vigorous activity they can say only a few words before pausing for breath.

  1. Begin with easy walking and check how you feel.
  2. For the fast interval, walk hard enough to raise your breathing clearly while keeping a stable stride.
  3. Slow down for the easy interval and let your breathing recover.
  4. If five cycles are too much, do fewer and build up gradually. That is a reasonable starting adaptation, but it is not the protocol tested in the original trial.

WHO guidelines advise adults to accumulate 150–300 minutes of moderate aerobic activity, 75–150 minutes of vigorous activity, or an equivalent combination each week, plus muscle-strengthening activity on at least two days. Interval walking can contribute to that total; it does not replace every other form of movement.

When to speak with a doctor first

If you have diagnosed heart or lung disease, uncontrolled blood pressure, pain with exertion, a recent operation, or a substantial mobility limitation, discuss the intensity with your clinician. Someone who is not used to exercise should start slowly and increase pace over time.

The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans list chest pain or pressure, dizziness, and joint pain among symptoms that warrant discussing an activity plan with a clinician. If one of these symptoms appears during a fast interval, stop the session.

Count it from a photo

Frequently asked questions

How do you do Japanese 3-by-3 interval walking?
The original protocol alternated three minutes above 70% of individual peak aerobic capacity for walking with three minutes at about 40%. Participants completed at least five cycles a day on four or more days a week for five months.
Is Japanese interval walking better than 10,000 steps?
That comparison has not been tested directly. The trial compared intervals with continuous moderate walking and a target of at least 8,000 steps a day. Intervals improved measured aerobic capacity and leg strength more, but steps describe total daily movement while intervals prescribe workout intensity.
Do I have to start with the full 30 minutes?
Thirty minutes was the tested dose of five cycles. WHO guidance supports starting with a smaller amount and gradually increasing frequency, intensity, and duration when needed. A shorter version should not be described as an exact replication of the study.
How can I tell whether the fast interval is fast enough?
Without an exercise test, the talk test is a rough guide: at vigorous relative intensity, you can say only a few words before pausing for breath. It is an estimate, not a substitute for measuring peak aerobic capacity.

Read next

Topics: Training · What the research shows

This article is for general information. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a prescription for treatment or a diet, and it does not replace a consultation with your doctor. If you have a health condition, are pregnant, take medication, or follow a diet prescribed to you, decisions about food belong with your doctor.

Figures from regulations, guidelines and studies are given as they stood when this article was prepared and may since have changed; check them against the primary sources. This article is not advertising, an offer, or individual advice, and neither the author nor the site owner is responsible for decisions taken on the basis of it.